dr.ricky online

Tag: community

  • The blue finger of democracy

    Blue finger of democracy

    In 2005, when elections were restored to Iraq, voters marked their participation by dipping their index finger in blue ink. Texas forbade the use of mail-in ballots for elections beyond a certain set of strictures, so most are forced to vote in person at a time when COVID–19 cases are increasing at an alarming rate in the state. Poll workers heroically dressed in PPE to allow citizens to practice their fundamental right to vote. Physical contact is limited, and each voter is provided a finger condom, and an alcohol wipe to sterilize surfaces. At the very least, one only needs one finger to interact with the voting machine (I’ll note that the machine isn’t easy to reach from a wheelchair).

    Election Day is July 14, 2020 but to avoid the potential crowds spreading the virus, early voting is advisable. Early voting should be accessible from just about any of the precincts. Go vote.

  • Court behavior beyond the game

    Court behavior beyond the game

    When people picture beach volleyball culture, they usually just think about just the game. People don’t seem to have to think about how the ball, or the net, or the court itself got there. Like the illusion of cooking shows on TV, these things didn’t actually magically appear – specially in public parks and areas, someone had to lug all the equipment there. Someone had to lay down lines, set up the net, bring out the balls. And someone has to break it all down and clear it away at the end of the day.

    In many venues, that someone is one person, or a very small group of people. The same dedicated people who will usually come week after week, spend the money out of their pockets to sustain the active social gathering. Oddly, though, this labor quickly becomes invisible. Players come to a venue simply assuming that they are entitled to challenge onto the courts, and fight to hang on to the courts. The commonly used “challenge” system can mean that those who have worked hardest to maintain a venue can end up using it the least.

    The unspoken injustice shows up in the gambit where players try to find that optimal timing to arrive late enough to avoid helping with set up, and leave early enough to avoid breakdown, while conspiring to form stacked teams to play as much as possible. Or in some cases, openly await the availability of the court set up to “steal” it from the ones who have worked on it. Anecdotally, I’ve observed self-professed “advanced” players disdainful to assist in these matters, more concerned about spending time warming up or stretching out — with the unspoken implication that the this is the appropriate burden for novices.

    Many communities have these selfless organizers and abused leaders, who do this for the love of the game. Afford them a bit more respect, and help to sustain the community. Offer to play with them, specially if you are borrowing their equipment. And at the very least speak your gratitude. Curb the entitlement, for those who rise in recognition often do so on the shoulders of the dedicated silent lovers of the game.

    Dedicated to the memory of Sammy delaSchott.

  • Nothing Teaches Like Concrete

    Nothing Teaches Like Concrete

    Available in tank top or tshirt formats.

    It’s a saying I heard while training parkour at Urban Movement . We respect the reality of concrete; the world is rarely padded.

    Urban Movement

  • A simple lesson

    A simple lesson

    Dust off the ball before tossing it to someone. This simple act should be automatic. It avoids a great deal of distress.

  • Sharing Volleyball Courts

    Sharing Volleyball Courts

    The abundance of public beach volleyball courts in Southern California is a pleasant anomaly. Locals usually do not have to compete for the availability of a court, but in most other places, beach volleyball courts are relatively rare, and communities have to share them. Very often, a park may only have one court, and cliques and alliances are often formed to defend priority in access.

    In civil interactions, though, the challenge court system is the most common traditional way for beach volleyball teams to share in the use of a court. When a pair of teams are playing against each other, waiting teams form a queue to challenge the winning team on the court. A winning team stays on the court, and a particular strong team can continuously play in theory. It’s also a source of great rancor when the list of teams waiting expands beyond around four waiting teams; the delays can be intolerably long for even the first attempt at using the court. For example, if six teams were sharing a court, the last team in line will have to wait for five entire games to be completed. Assuming an average 20 minutes per game, that is almost two hours.

    In practice, however, is that the wait is usually much longer. In traditional challenge court systems, the court itself is unused for significant periods of time, sometimes because the challenging team hasn’t warmed up in preparation – but most often because of delays caused by the winning team. After a set, the winning team requires a period of time to hydrate, catch their breath, use the restroom…in the meantime, the court is unavailable to any of the sitting teams. These delays add up, specially if the winning team has continuously won several games in a row.

    A solution

    I propose a skip-challenge system. Let’s assume there are six teams, A-F sharing the court. In the first set, team A plays team B. Assuming team A wins, both teams immediately step off the court at the point of victory, to allow an already warmed up team C and team D to begin playing. Teams A and B can share pleasantries at this time, and hydrate as needed, and prepare for the match between teams A and E (B goes to the end of the line). Assuming team C wins, both teams get off the court right away for teams A and E, and the next game is between teams C and F. The challenge then iterates from that point on.

    1. In the above example, team F gets on the court a full game earlier than in the standard challenge court system. Plus time saved from not having to wait for the recovery of the winning team makes it even faster.
    2. Every team sits at least one game after playing. Winning teams earn the right to limit this to one game, losing teams go to the end of the line.
    3. There’s no delay in getting teams to using the court, this maximizes the use of the facility and daylight.
    4. The desire to get on the court quickly incentivizes adoption of shorter, lower point games, since it shortens sitting times for everyone, although this is entirely optional.

    For large groups of teams, the skip challenge system may be a more equitable way of distributing a scarce resource, and keep volleyball communities healthy.